INDQ vs. NDIA

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

INDQ (Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF) and NDIA (Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDQ is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Pacer, while NDIA is a India Equities fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. INDQ charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for NDIA.

Performance

INDQ vs. NDIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INDQ

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -1.84%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NDIA

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: -0.88%
• 6M: -5.26%
• YTD: -9.39%
• 1Y: -8.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF	$12.77K	$11.88K	$46.17K
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	$78.08K	$87.11K	$397.82K

INDQ vs. NDIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF	2.93%
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between INDQ and NDIA is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026	0.81

Return for Risk

INDQ vs. NDIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NDIA

NDIA Risk / Return Rank: 5
NDIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
NDIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NDIA Omega Ratio Rank: 6
NDIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
NDIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDQ vs. NDIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INDQ	NDIA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.51	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.64	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.93	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.49	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.12	—

Drawdowns

INDQ vs. NDIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDQ drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum NDIA drawdown of -22.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDQ and NDIA.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDQ	NDIA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.46%	-22.05%	+12.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.30%	-15.98%	+9.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-7.50%	+3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INDQ	NDIA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.04%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.97%	16.26%	+2.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.97%	15.60%	+3.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.97%	15.60%	+3.37%

INDQ vs. NDIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDQ has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than NDIA's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDQ vs. NDIA - Dividend Comparison

INDQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NDIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF	1.21%	1.10%	3.66%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDQ and NDIA in my portfolio?

INDQ and NDIA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INDQ or NDIA?

On fees, NDIA is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDQ or NDIA?

NDIA is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for INDQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDQ or NDIA?

NDIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for INDQ.

What is the main difference between INDQ and NDIA?

INDQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while NDIA is India Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for INDQ and 0.76% for NDIA.