NDIA vs. INCO
NDIA (Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF) and INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. NDIA is actively managed, while INCO is passively managed. Over the past year, NDIA returned -7.48% vs -5.19% for INCO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NDIA charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for INCO.
Performance
NDIA vs. INCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDIA achieves a -8.20% return, which is significantly lower than INCO's -7.34% return.
NDIA
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- -8.20%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- 1Y
- -7.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INCO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- -7.14%
- 1Y
- -5.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
NDIA vs. INCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF | -8.20% | 5.04% | 5.75% | 12.76% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -7.34% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDIA and INCO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between NDIA and INCO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
NDIA vs. INCO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NDIA
INCO
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
NDIA
INCO
-
Consumer Cyclical
NDIA
INCO
Industrials
NDIA
INCO
Energy
NDIA
INCO
-
Basic Materials
NDIA
INCO
-
Technology
NDIA
INCO
Consumer Defensive
NDIA
INCO
Communication Services
NDIA
INCO
-
Healthcare
NDIA
INCO
-
Utilities
NDIA
INCO
-
Real Estate
NDIA
INCO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDIA vs. INCO — Risk / Return Rank
NDIA
INCO
NDIA vs. INCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NDIA | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.96 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.24 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | -0.59 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NDIA vs. INCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDIA drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, smaller than the maximum INCO drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIA and INCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDIA | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -47.69% | +25.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.03% | -21.37% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.88% | -21.09% | +6.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -10.61% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.76% | 8.84% | -1.08% |
Volatility
NDIA vs. INCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) is 3.93%, while Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that NDIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDIA | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 4.93% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 14.49% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.85% | 17.01% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 16.97% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 20.33% | -4.73% |
NDIA vs. INCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDIA has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than INCO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NDIA vs. INCO - Dividend Comparison
NDIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, while INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF | 1.20% | 1.10% | 3.66% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDIA and INCO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCO has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to NDIA (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDIA dropped -22.05% vs INCO's -47.69%.
On 1-year performance, INCO leads with -5.19% vs -7.48% for NDIA. On fees, INCO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NDIA has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INCO has performed better with a -5.19% return vs -7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for NDIA.
NDIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for NDIA and 0.75% for INCO.
INCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NDIA and INCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer