INDF vs. FLTR
INDF (Nifty India Financials ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Nifty Financial Services 25/50 Index, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INDF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
INDF vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INDF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.76M | $33.35M | $28.52M |
INDF vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDF Nifty India Financials ETF | 0.00% | 8.17% | 6.32% | 19.86% | -5.28% | 11.95% | 24.44% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.70% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDF and FLTR is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2020 | 0.12 |
The correlation between INDF and FLTR shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDF vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
INDF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLTR
INDF vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDF | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.96 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 16.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 95.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDF vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDF | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -17.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.67% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
INDF vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDF | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.80% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 5.00% | — |
INDF vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDF vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
INDF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.21% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
INDF Nifty India Financials ETF | 21.29% | 21.29% | 6.15% | 8.84% | 3.12% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDF and FLTR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INDF.
INDF has the higher dividend yield at 21.29%, compared with 4.21% for FLTR.
INDF is categorized as Financials Equities, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. INDF tracks Nifty Financial Services 25/50 Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INDF and 0.14% for FLTR.
Find the right allocation for INDF and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer