PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INCO vs. FLPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INCO vs. FLPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -12.41% return, which is significantly lower than FLPSX's 8.78% return. Over the past 10 years, INCO has underperformed FLPSX with an annualized return of 8.31%, while FLPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.


INCO

1D
-0.65%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
-12.41%
6M
-10.02%
1Y
-12.31%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
8.31%

FLPSX

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
8.78%
6M
10.09%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCO vs. FLPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INCO
Columbia India Consumer ETF
-12.41%0.59%12.70%34.63%-7.01%19.28%14.55%-4.22%-10.81%53.28%
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
8.78%14.69%7.23%14.41%-5.69%24.46%9.34%25.75%-10.80%18.88%

Correlation

The correlation between INCO and FLPSX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2011

0.44

The correlation between INCO and FLPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INCO vs. FLPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCO
INCO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FLPSX
FLPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FLPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FLPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCO vs. FLPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INCOFLPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.30

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

2.37

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

8.05

-9.51

INCO vs. FLPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the FLPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCO and FLPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INCOFLPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

1.66

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.47

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.62

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.85

-0.43

Drawdowns

INCO vs. FLPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, smaller than the maximum FLPSX drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and FLPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INCOFLPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.69%

-54.81%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.37%

-8.87%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.98%

-17.66%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.98%

-18.76%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.69%

-38.16%

-9.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.40%

-1.30%

-24.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

-5.66%

-4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.47%

2.61%

+5.86%

Volatility

INCO vs. FLPSX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) at 3.28%. This indicates that INCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INCOFLPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

3.28%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

8.96%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.90%

12.63%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

17.20%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

17.36%

+2.96%

INCO vs. FLPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FLPSX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

INCO vs. FLPSX - Dividend Comparison

INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
12.21%13.28%16.24%18.29%9.45%12.11%11.14%8.14%13.45%7.45%4.85%4.04%
INCO
Columbia India Consumer ETF
0.00%0.00%2.88%3.81%10.57%6.25%0.34%0.28%0.12%0.05%0.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INCO and FLPSX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INCO has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to FLPSX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs FLPSX's -54.81%.

FLPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INCO and FLPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer