INCO vs. FFLC

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCO is a India Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index, while FFLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. INCO is passively managed, while FFLC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCO returned 6.72%/yr vs 16.87%/yr for FFLC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FFLC.

Performance

INCO vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -8.71% return, which is significantly lower than FFLC's 10.97% return.

INCO

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -1.11%
• 6M: -4.14%
• YTD: -8.71%
• 1Y: -7.94%
• 3Y*: 6.40%
• 5Y*: 6.72%
• 10Y*: 8.08%
• ALL TIME*: 9.20%

FFLC

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: 10.76%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 1Y: 20.01%
• 3Y*: 21.11%
• 5Y*: 16.87%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCO vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	-8.71%	0.59%	12.70%	34.63%	-7.01%	19.28%	29.34%
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	10.97%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.04%	24.53%	19.50%

Correlation

The correlation between INCO and FFLC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.40

INCO vs. FFLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INCO	FFLC
Consumer Cyclical	61.2%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	36.0%	3.9%
Healthcare	2.0%	8.6%
Industrials	1.4%	11.7%
Technology	0.8%	31.2%
Basic Materials	-	2.0%
Communication Services	-	11.3%
Energy	-	4.3%
Financial Services	-	12.1%
Real Estate	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

INCO vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCO

INCO Risk / Return Rank: 6
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FFLC

FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 59
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCO vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INCO	FFLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	1.47	-1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.58	2.06	-2.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.26	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	2.01	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	8.84	-9.68

INCO vs. FFLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCO and FFLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INCO vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and FFLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCO	FFLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.69%	-19.72%	-27.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.37%	-9.98%	-11.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.98%	-19.72%	-10.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	-19.72%	-10.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.25%	-0.89%	-21.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.67%	-2.95%	-7.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.47%	2.27%	+7.20%

Volatility

INCO vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) is 3.35%, while Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that INCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCO	FFLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	3.77%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	10.92%	+3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.08%	13.69%	+3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	16.91%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.29%	17.62%	+2.67%

INCO vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCO vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	0.99%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.88%	3.81%	10.57%	6.25%	0.34%	0.28%	0.12%	0.05%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCO and FFLC in my portfolio?

INCO and FFLC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCO or FFLC?

FFLC has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to INCO (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs FFLC's -19.72%.

Which ETF is better, INCO or FFLC?

On 5-year performance, FFLC leads with 16.87% vs 6.72% for INCO. On fees, FFLC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, INCO has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCO or FFLC?

Over the 5-year period, FFLC has performed better with a 16.87% return vs 6.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCO or FFLC?

FFLC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCO or FFLC?

FFLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.

What is the main difference between INCO and FFLC?

INCO is categorized as India Equities, while FFLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.38% for FFLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.