PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INCO vs. EWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INCO vs. EWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -12.27% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 8.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INCO having a 8.19% annualized return and EWS not far behind at 7.91%.


INCO

1D
-1.56%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
-12.27%
6M
-10.65%
1Y
-11.02%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
8.19%

EWS

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.60%
YTD
8.22%
6M
8.37%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCO vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INCO
Columbia India Consumer ETF
-12.27%0.59%12.70%34.63%-7.01%19.28%14.55%-4.22%-10.81%53.28%
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
8.22%31.35%22.10%6.15%-9.80%5.47%-8.47%14.54%-11.34%34.78%

Correlation

The correlation between INCO and EWS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2011

0.42

The correlation between INCO and EWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INCO vs. EWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INCO
EWS

Consumer Cyclical

59.3%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

37.5%
4.6%

Technology

1.9%
4.0%

Industrials

1.4%
18.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

4.2%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

52.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

8.6%

Utilities

-

4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

INCO
59.3%
EWS
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

INCO
37.5%
EWS
4.6%

Technology

INCO
1.9%
EWS
4.0%

Industrials

INCO
1.4%
EWS
18.1%

Basic Materials

INCO

-

EWS

-

Communication Services

INCO

-

EWS
4.2%

Energy

INCO

-

EWS

-

Financial Services

INCO

-

EWS
52.2%

Healthcare

INCO

-

EWS

-

Real Estate

INCO

-

EWS
8.6%

Utilities

INCO

-

EWS
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INCO vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCO
INCO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EWS
EWS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCO vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INCOEWSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

1.32

-1.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.87

1.96

-2.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.24

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

2.49

-3.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.33

6.08

-7.41

INCO vs. EWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the EWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCO and EWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INCOEWSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

1.32

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.55

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.44

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.15

+0.27

Drawdowns

INCO vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and EWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INCOEWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.69%

-75.00%

+27.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.37%

-7.82%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.98%

-16.34%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.98%

-29.06%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.69%

-40.84%

-6.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.29%

-0.70%

-24.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-21.88%

+11.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

3.20%

+5.10%

Volatility

INCO vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison

Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) at 3.68%. This indicates that INCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INCOEWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

3.68%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

11.45%

+2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

14.73%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

17.25%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

18.03%

+2.28%

INCO vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

INCO vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison

INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
3.79%4.10%4.28%6.50%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%
INCO
Columbia India Consumer ETF
0.00%0.00%2.88%3.81%10.57%6.25%0.34%0.28%0.12%0.05%0.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INCO and EWS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INCO has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to EWS (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs EWS's -75.00%.

On 10-year performance, INCO leads with 8.19% vs 7.91% for EWS. On fees, EWS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, INCO has performed better with a 8.19% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.

EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.

INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index, while EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.50% for EWS.

EWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INCO and EWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer