PortfoliosLab logo
EWS vs. EWH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EWS and EWH is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

EWS vs. EWH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%200.00%220.00%240.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
157.71%
215.69%
EWS
EWH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EWS:

1.77

EWH:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

EWS:

2.47

EWH:

1.21

Omega Ratio

EWS:

1.40

EWH:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

EWS:

2.17

EWH:

0.48

Martin Ratio

EWS:

11.92

EWH:

1.54

Ulcer Index

EWS:

2.97%

EWH:

12.62%

Daily Std Dev

EWS:

20.01%

EWH:

24.98%

Max Drawdown

EWS:

-75.20%

EWH:

-66.43%

Current Drawdown

EWS:

-0.58%

EWH:

-29.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than EWH's 3.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EWS has outperformed EWH with an annualized return of 2.95%, while EWH has yielded a comparatively lower -0.16% annualized return.


EWS

YTD

9.98%

1M

-0.04%

6M

12.65%

1Y

33.00%

5Y*

11.20%

10Y*

2.95%

EWH

YTD

3.06%

1M

-2.94%

6M

-2.10%

1Y

15.50%

5Y*

-0.83%

10Y*

-0.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EWS vs. EWH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EWH's 0.49% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for EWS: current value is 0.50%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
EWS: 0.50%
Expense ratio chart for EWH: current value is 0.49%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
EWH: 0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EWS vs. EWH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EWS is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EWS is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EWS is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EWS is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EWS is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EWS is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EWH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EWH is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EWH is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EWH is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EWH is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EWH is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EWH is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EWS vs. EWH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for EWS, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
EWS: 1.77
EWH: 0.78
The chart of Sortino ratio for EWS, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
EWS: 2.47
EWH: 1.21
The chart of Omega ratio for EWS, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
EWS: 1.40
EWH: 1.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for EWS, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
EWS: 2.17
EWH: 0.48
The chart of Martin ratio for EWS, currently valued at 11.92, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
EWS: 11.92
EWH: 1.54

The current EWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the EWH Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWS and EWH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.77
0.78
EWS
EWH

Dividends

EWS vs. EWH - Dividend Comparison

EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than EWH's 4.05% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
3.89%4.28%6.49%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%3.35%
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
4.05%4.17%4.28%2.91%2.78%2.56%2.71%2.93%4.35%3.08%2.63%3.52%

Drawdowns

EWS vs. EWH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.20%, which is greater than EWH's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and EWH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.58%
-29.99%
EWS
EWH

Volatility

EWS vs. EWH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) at 10.87%. This indicates that EWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.82%
10.87%
EWS
EWH