PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWS vs. SMIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWS vs. SMIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than SMIN's -4.45% return. Over the past 10 years, EWS has underperformed SMIN with an annualized return of 7.98%, while SMIN has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.


EWS

1D
0.94%
1M
3.67%
YTD
8.98%
6M
8.94%
1Y
20.16%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
7.98%

SMIN

1D
0.39%
1M
0.75%
YTD
-4.45%
6M
-4.60%
1Y
-9.35%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
9.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWS vs. SMIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
8.98%31.35%22.10%6.15%-9.80%5.47%-8.47%14.54%-11.34%34.78%
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
-4.45%-6.68%16.78%35.41%-14.23%44.43%19.59%-5.21%-25.55%62.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EWS and SMIN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2012

0.42

EWS vs. SMIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWS
SMIN

Financial Services

52.2%
18.9%

Industrials

18.1%
21.1%

Real Estate

8.6%
3.6%

Utilities

4.7%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.0%

Communication Services

4.2%
1.6%

Technology

4.0%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
13.5%

Basic Materials

-

12.2%

Energy

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

13.7%

Financial Services

EWS
52.2%
SMIN
18.9%

Industrials

EWS
18.1%
SMIN
21.1%

Real Estate

EWS
8.6%
SMIN
3.6%

Utilities

EWS
4.7%
SMIN
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

EWS
4.6%
SMIN
4.0%

Communication Services

EWS
4.2%
SMIN
1.6%

Technology

EWS
4.0%
SMIN
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWS
3.5%
SMIN
13.5%

Basic Materials

EWS

-

SMIN
12.2%

Energy

EWS

-

SMIN
0.9%

Healthcare

EWS

-

SMIN
13.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWS vs. SMIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWS
EWS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SMIN
SMIN Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
SMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWS vs. SMIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWSSMINDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

-0.51

+1.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

-0.64

+2.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.93

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.35

+3.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.72

-0.81

+7.53

EWS vs. SMIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the SMIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWS and SMIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWSSMINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

-0.51

+1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.35

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.43

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.36

-0.21

Drawdowns

EWS vs. SMIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, which is greater than SMIN's maximum drawdown of -60.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and SMIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWSSMINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.00%

-60.50%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-24.54%

+16.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-27.58%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

-27.58%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.84%

-60.50%

+19.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.44%

+16.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-14.62%

-7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

10.75%

-7.55%

Volatility

EWS vs. SMIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) is 4.01%, while iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that EWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWSSMINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

5.72%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

15.49%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.75%

18.40%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

18.83%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

22.82%

-4.79%

EWS vs. SMIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIN's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWS vs. SMIN - Dividend Comparison

EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than SMIN's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
3.76%4.10%4.28%6.50%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
2.11%2.01%6.84%0.41%0.01%1.27%1.06%1.75%1.68%0.89%2.30%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWS and SMIN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMIN has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to EWS (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.00% vs SMIN's -60.50%.

On 10-year performance, SMIN leads with 9.72% vs 7.98% for EWS. On fees, EWS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMIN has performed better with a 9.72% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for SMIN.

EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 2.11% for SMIN.

EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while SMIN tracks MSCI India Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWS and 0.76% for SMIN.

EWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWS and SMIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer