EWS vs. SMIN
EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) and SMIN (iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - EWS tracks the MSCI Singapore Index while SMIN tracks the MSCI India Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWS returned 7.98%/yr vs 9.72%/yr for SMIN. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for SMIN.
Performance
EWS vs. SMIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than SMIN's -4.45% return. Over the past 10 years, EWS has underperformed SMIN with an annualized return of 7.98%, while SMIN has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.
EWS
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
SMIN
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -4.60%
- 1Y
- -9.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
EWS vs. SMIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 8.98% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF | -4.45% | -6.68% | 16.78% | 35.41% | -14.23% | 44.43% | 19.59% | -5.21% | -25.55% | 62.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWS and SMIN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2012 | 0.42 |
EWS vs. SMIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWS
SMIN
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
EWS
SMIN
Industrials
EWS
SMIN
Real Estate
EWS
SMIN
Utilities
EWS
SMIN
Consumer Defensive
EWS
SMIN
Communication Services
EWS
SMIN
Technology
EWS
SMIN
Consumer Cyclical
EWS
SMIN
Basic Materials
EWS
-
SMIN
Energy
EWS
-
SMIN
Healthcare
EWS
-
SMIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWS vs. SMIN — Risk / Return Rank
EWS
SMIN
EWS vs. SMIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWS | SMIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | -0.51 | +1.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | -0.64 | +2.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.93 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | -0.35 | +3.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.72 | -0.81 | +7.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWS | SMIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | -0.51 | +1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.35 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.36 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
EWS vs. SMIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, which is greater than SMIN's maximum drawdown of -60.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and SMIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWS | SMIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.00% | -60.50% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -24.54% | +16.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.34% | -27.58% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -27.58% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.84% | -60.50% | +19.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -16.44% | +16.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -14.62% | -7.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 10.75% | -7.55% |
Volatility
EWS vs. SMIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) is 4.01%, while iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that EWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWS | SMIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 5.72% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 15.49% | -3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 18.40% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 18.83% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 22.82% | -4.79% |
EWS vs. SMIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIN's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWS vs. SMIN - Dividend Comparison
EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than SMIN's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.76% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF | 2.11% | 2.01% | 6.84% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 1.27% | 1.06% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 2.30% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWS and SMIN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMIN has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to EWS (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.00% vs SMIN's -60.50%.
On 10-year performance, SMIN leads with 9.72% vs 7.98% for EWS. On fees, EWS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMIN has performed better with a 9.72% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for SMIN.
EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 2.11% for SMIN.
EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while SMIN tracks MSCI India Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWS and 0.76% for SMIN.
EWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWS and SMIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer