EWS vs. ASEA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA).
EWS and ASEA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Singapore Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. ASEA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 2011. Both EWS and ASEA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWS or ASEA.
Correlation
The correlation between EWS and ASEA is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EWS vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EWS:
1.63
ASEA:
0.52
EWS:
2.31
ASEA:
0.85
EWS:
1.37
ASEA:
1.11
EWS:
2.00
ASEA:
0.43
EWS:
10.97
ASEA:
1.28
EWS:
2.97%
ASEA:
7.50%
EWS:
20.00%
ASEA:
18.62%
EWS:
-75.20%
ASEA:
-44.14%
EWS:
-0.70%
ASEA:
-10.85%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than ASEA's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EWS has outperformed ASEA with an annualized return of 2.86%, while ASEA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.68% annualized return.
EWS
9.84%
0.17%
13.28%
32.28%
11.16%
2.86%
ASEA
-0.98%
0.00%
-5.49%
10.39%
10.53%
2.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWS vs. ASEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ASEA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWS vs. ASEA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EWS
ASEA
EWS vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWS vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison
EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than ASEA's 3.64% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.90% | 4.28% | 6.49% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% | 3.35% |
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 3.64% | 3.61% | 3.76% | 2.23% | 4.18% | 2.27% | 2.51% | 3.08% | 1.59% | 2.78% | 3.64% | 2.65% |
Drawdowns
EWS vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.20%, which is greater than ASEA's maximum drawdown of -44.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and ASEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWS vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 11.81%. This indicates that EWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.