PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INCE vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INCE vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INCE having a 13.04% return and FDL slightly higher at 13.33%.


INCE

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.34%
YTD
13.04%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCE vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
13.04%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%19.66%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between INCE and FDL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.68

The correlation between INCE and FDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

INCE vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INCE
FDL

Financial Services

10.5%
15.1%

Industrials

9.8%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
14.7%

Energy

8.1%
27.3%

Technology

7.6%
1.1%

Utilities

6.4%
6.5%

Basic Materials

4.5%
0.3%

Healthcare

4.3%
16.8%

Communication Services

2.6%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
3.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

INCE
10.5%
FDL
15.1%

Industrials

INCE
9.8%
FDL
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

INCE
9.3%
FDL
14.7%

Energy

INCE
8.1%
FDL
27.3%

Technology

INCE
7.6%
FDL
1.1%

Utilities

INCE
6.4%
FDL
6.5%

Basic Materials

INCE
4.5%
FDL
0.3%

Healthcare

INCE
4.3%
FDL
16.8%

Communication Services

INCE
2.6%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

INCE
2.2%
FDL
3.8%

Real Estate

INCE

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INCE vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCE
INCE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCE vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INCEFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.37

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

5.56

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.83

13.56

+7.27

INCE vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCE Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCE and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INCEFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

2.11

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.88

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.45

+0.39

Drawdowns

INCE vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INCEFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-65.93%

+31.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.90%

-4.27%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.01%

-12.24%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

-16.46%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-2.18%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-9.66%

+6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.75%

-0.45%

Volatility

INCE vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.02%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INCEFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

2.85%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

7.87%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.32%

11.28%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

14.31%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

17.11%

-1.42%

INCE vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

INCE vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
4.73%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INCE and FDL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to INCE (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.51% vs 11.11% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 3.68% for FDL.

INCE is categorized as Dividend, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for INCE and 0.45% for FDL.

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INCE and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer