IMVP vs. DBEM
IMVP (Invesco India ETF) and DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IMVP tracks the FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index while DBEM tracks the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMVP returned 8.19%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for DBEM. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMVP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DBEM.
Performance
IMVP vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMVP achieves a -16.08% return, which is significantly lower than DBEM's 32.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IMVP has underperformed DBEM with an annualized return of 8.19%, while DBEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return.
IMVP
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- -16.08%
- 6M
- -14.80%
- 1Y
- -16.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
DBEM
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 32.18%
- 6M
- 34.98%
- 1Y
- 64.04%
- 3Y*
- 25.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
IMVP vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMVP Invesco India ETF | -16.08% | 1.30% | 9.07% | 22.82% | -9.35% | 23.68% | 18.41% | 14.26% | -7.55% | 38.51% |
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 32.18% | 30.42% | 10.61% | 10.53% | -17.00% | -2.26% | 18.12% | 16.77% | -10.81% | 27.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMVP and DBEM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011 | 0.58 |
The correlation between IMVP and DBEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMVP vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank
IMVP
DBEM
IMVP vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMVP | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.64 | -0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 6.13 | -6.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | 24.38 | -26.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMVP | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 3.58 | -4.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.57 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.63 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.34 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
IMVP vs. DBEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMVP drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than DBEM's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMVP and DBEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMVP | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.54% | -33.51% | -31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.44% | -10.51% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.80% | -15.12% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -30.48% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -33.51% | -6.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.71% | -0.69% | -23.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -11.69% | -5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.16% | 2.63% | +6.53% |
Volatility
IMVP vs. DBEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) is 6.00%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that IMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMVP | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 7.53% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 15.53% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 17.96% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 17.08% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 17.14% | +2.45% |
IMVP vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMVP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMVP vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison
IMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than DBEM's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 1.39% | 1.84% | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 2.59% | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 3.49% |
IMVP Invesco India ETF | 8.81% | 7.39% | 8.48% | 2.08% | 14.07% | 6.95% | 0.72% | 36.35% | 0.96% | 1.01% | 1.18% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMVP and DBEM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEM has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to IMVP (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMVP dropped -64.54% vs DBEM's -33.51%.
On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 10.73% vs 8.19% for IMVP. On fees, DBEM is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, IMVP has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEM is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IMVP.
IMVP has the higher dividend yield at 8.81%, compared with 1.39% for DBEM.
IMVP tracks FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IMVP and 0.66% for DBEM.
DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMVP and DBEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer