IMVP vs. INCO
IMVP (Invesco India ETF) and INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMVP is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while INCO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMVP returned 8.19%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for INCO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMVP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for INCO.
Performance
IMVP vs. INCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMVP achieves a -16.08% return, which is significantly lower than INCO's -12.27% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: IMVP at 8.19% and INCO at 8.19%.
IMVP
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- -16.08%
- 6M
- -14.80%
- 1Y
- -16.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
INCO
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -12.27%
- 6M
- -10.65%
- 1Y
- -11.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
IMVP vs. INCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMVP Invesco India ETF | -16.08% | 1.30% | 9.07% | 22.82% | -9.35% | 23.68% | 18.41% | 14.26% | -7.55% | 38.51% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -12.27% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 34.63% | -7.01% | 19.28% | 14.55% | -4.22% | -10.81% | 53.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMVP and INCO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IMVP and INCO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMVP vs. INCO — Risk / Return Rank
IMVP
INCO
IMVP vs. INCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMVP | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | -0.66 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | -0.87 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.90 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.52 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | -1.33 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMVP | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | -0.66 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.33 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.40 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.42 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
IMVP vs. INCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMVP drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than INCO's maximum drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMVP and INCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMVP | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.54% | -47.69% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.44% | -21.37% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.80% | -29.98% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -29.98% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -47.69% | +8.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.71% | -25.29% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -10.57% | -6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.16% | 8.30% | +0.86% |
Volatility
IMVP vs. INCO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) have volatilities of 6.00% and 5.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMVP | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 5.78% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 14.29% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 16.78% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 16.89% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 20.31% | -0.72% |
IMVP vs. INCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMVP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than INCO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMVP vs. INCO - Dividend Comparison
IMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, while INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMVP Invesco India ETF | 8.81% | 7.39% | 8.48% | 2.08% | 14.07% | 6.95% | 0.72% | 36.35% | 0.96% | 1.01% | 1.18% | 0.61% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMVP and INCO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMVP has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to INCO (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMVP dropped -64.54% vs INCO's -47.69%.
On 10-year performance, INCO leads with 8.19% vs 8.19% for IMVP. On fees, INCO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, INCO has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, INCO has performed better with a 8.19% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IMVP.
IMVP has the higher dividend yield at 8.81%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
IMVP is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while INCO is Asia Pacific Equities. IMVP tracks FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IMVP and 0.75% for INCO.
INCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMVP and INCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer