PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.29%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.


IMTM

1D
-0.39%
1M
4.43%
YTD
11.05%
6M
14.04%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.29%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.05%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and VYM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2015

0.61

The correlation between IMTM and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
VYM

Financial Services

29.6%
20.5%

Industrials

17.5%
12.1%

Technology

11.4%
17.7%

Energy

9.4%
9.8%

Basic Materials

9.3%
3.5%

Healthcare

9.0%
12.2%

Utilities

6.4%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
8.1%

Communication Services

1.9%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
6.7%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.0%

Financial Services

IMTM
29.6%
VYM
20.5%

Industrials

IMTM
17.5%
VYM
12.1%

Technology

IMTM
11.4%
VYM
17.7%

Energy

IMTM
9.4%
VYM
9.8%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.3%
VYM
3.5%

Healthcare

IMTM
9.0%
VYM
12.2%

Utilities

IMTM
6.4%
VYM
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.4%
VYM
8.1%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.9%
VYM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
VYM
6.7%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.2%
VYM
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMTMVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.93

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

14.76

-7.29

IMTM vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTMVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.56

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.83

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.73

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.51

-0.01

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-56.98%

+24.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-6.69%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-14.46%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-15.84%

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

-35.21%

+2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.43%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-7.19%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.78%

+1.43%

Volatility

IMTM vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

2.77%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

7.67%

+7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

10.28%

+6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

13.96%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

16.34%

+1.30%

IMTM vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.23%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMTM and VYM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMTM has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.90% vs 10.29% for IMTM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 10.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.19% for VYM.

IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while VYM is Dividend. IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer