PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 9.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 10.18%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.51% annualized return.


IMTM

1D
-3.05%
1M
0.97%
YTD
11.09%
6M
10.38%
1Y
24.50%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
10.18%

IDMO

1D
-2.67%
1M
1.51%
YTD
9.69%
6M
8.93%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
13.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.09%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
9.69%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and IDMO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015

0.74

Over the past year, IMTM and IDMO have become more correlated (0.97) than their long-term average of 0.74, meaning their price movements have been converging.

IMTM vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
IDMO

Financial Services

28.6%
43.2%

Technology

15.6%
6.2%

Industrials

15.5%
21.3%

Energy

10.0%
1.7%

Basic Materials

9.7%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.9%
1.1%

Utilities

5.3%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
1.5%

Communication Services

1.5%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Financial Services

IMTM
28.6%
IDMO
43.2%

Technology

IMTM
15.6%
IDMO
6.2%

Industrials

IMTM
15.5%
IDMO
21.3%

Energy

IMTM
10.0%
IDMO
1.7%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.7%
IDMO
10.6%

Healthcare

IMTM
8.9%
IDMO
1.1%

Utilities

IMTM
5.3%
IDMO
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.1%
IDMO
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
IDMO
1.5%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.5%
IDMO
2.1%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.1%
IDMO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMTMIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.15

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

8.70

-1.12

IMTM vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-39.38%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-12.31%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-12.65%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-27.07%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

-31.34%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-2.67%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-9.73%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.03%

+0.21%

Volatility

IMTM vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) is 7.39%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that IMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

7.84%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.35%

16.34%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.19%

18.13%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

18.09%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

17.95%

-0.33%

IMTM vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than IDMO's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.64%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.41%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IMTM and IDMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to IMTM (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 13.51% vs 10.18% for IMTM. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IMTM has been the lower-risk option at 7.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 3.64% for IDMO.

IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer