PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. JMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.79% return.


IMTM

1D
-0.39%
1M
4.43%
YTD
11.05%
6M
14.04%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.29%

JMOM

1D
-0.17%
1M
9.35%
YTD
22.79%
6M
22.27%
1Y
36.77%
3Y*
28.37%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.05%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%0.96%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
22.79%18.02%28.47%22.89%-20.83%25.03%29.25%28.24%-5.25%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and JMOM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.73

The correlation between IMTM and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
JMOM

Financial Services

29.6%
9.6%

Industrials

17.5%
12.8%

Technology

11.4%
38.1%

Energy

9.4%
3.8%

Basic Materials

9.3%
1.3%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.7%

Utilities

6.4%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
5.7%

Communication Services

1.9%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.5%

Financial Services

IMTM
29.6%
JMOM
9.6%

Industrials

IMTM
17.5%
JMOM
12.8%

Technology

IMTM
11.4%
JMOM
38.1%

Energy

IMTM
9.4%
JMOM
3.8%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.3%
JMOM
1.3%

Healthcare

IMTM
9.0%
JMOM
8.7%

Utilities

IMTM
6.4%
JMOM
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.4%
JMOM
5.7%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.9%
JMOM
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
JMOM
6.9%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.2%
JMOM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMTMJMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

4.69

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

22.24

-14.78

IMTM vs. JMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the JMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and JMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTMJMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.58

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.88

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.82

-0.32

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum JMOM drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and JMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMJMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-34.31%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-7.87%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-19.51%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-28.26%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.17%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-6.32%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.66%

+1.55%

Volatility

IMTM vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) at 4.62%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMJMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

4.62%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

11.55%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

14.32%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.65%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

20.13%

-2.49%

IMTM vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than JMOM's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.23%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.71%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMTM and JMOM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMTM has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to JMOM (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs JMOM's -34.31%.

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 9.00% for IMTM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.

IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.12% for JMOM.

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and JMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer