PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTG vs. MTBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTG vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IMTG

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.23%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTBA

1D
0.10%
1M
0.23%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
0.34%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTG vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
IMTG
Invesco Agency MBS ETF
-1.11%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
-1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTG and MTBA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTG vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTG

MTBA
MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTG vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IMTG vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTGMTBADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.86

1.31

-2.17

Drawdowns

IMTG vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum MTBA drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and MTBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTGMTBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-3.48%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.50%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-0.79%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

Volatility

IMTG vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTGMTBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.74%

3.10%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.74%

3.95%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

3.95%

+0.79%

IMTG vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMTG vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than MTBA's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IMTG
Invesco Agency MBS ETF
0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
6.08%5.98%6.03%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IMTG and MTBA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for IMTG.

MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 0.85% for IMTG.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.15% for MTBA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTG and MTBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer