PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IMTG

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.23%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
IMTG
Invesco Agency MBS ETF
-1.11%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTG and QQQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTG

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IMTG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTGQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.86

0.41

-1.27

Drawdowns

IMTG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-82.97%

+80.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-0.26%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-32.79%

+31.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

Volatility

IMTG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.74%

15.94%

-11.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.74%

22.38%

-17.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

22.29%

-17.55%

IMTG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMTG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTG
Invesco Agency MBS ETF
0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMTG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for IMTG.

IMTG has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

IMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.18% for QQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer