IMTG vs. QQQ
IMTG (Invesco Agency MBS ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMTG is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Invesco, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. IMTG is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMTG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
IMTG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMTG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
IMTG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | -1.11% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTG and QQQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IMTG
QQQ
IMTG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 0.41 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
IMTG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -82.97% | +80.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -0.26% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -32.79% | +31.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
IMTG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 15.94% | -11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 22.38% | -17.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 22.29% | -17.55% |
IMTG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMTG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMTG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for IMTG.
IMTG has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
IMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.18% for QQQ.
Find the right allocation for IMTG and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer