IMTG vs. MBSD
IMTG (Invesco Agency MBS ETF) and MBSD (FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. IMTG is actively managed, while MBSD is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMTG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MBSD.
Performance
IMTG vs. MBSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMTG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBSD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
IMTG vs. MBSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | -1.11% |
MBSD FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTG and MBSD is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTG vs. MBSD — Risk / Return Rank
IMTG
MBSD
IMTG vs. MBSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTG | MBSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 0.38 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
IMTG vs. MBSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum MBSD drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and MBSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTG | MBSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -14.36% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -1.19% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -2.81% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility
IMTG vs. MBSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTG | MBSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 3.53% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 5.15% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 4.26% | +0.48% |
IMTG vs. MBSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MBSD's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMTG vs. MBSD - Dividend Comparison
IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than MBSD's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MBSD FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund | 4.19% | 4.23% | 3.91% | 3.39% | 3.03% | 2.41% | 2.78% | 3.42% | 3.22% | 3.30% | 3.02% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IMTG and MBSD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MBSD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBSD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for IMTG.
MBSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.85% for IMTG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.20% for MBSD.
Find the right allocation for IMTG and MBSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer