IMST vs. MSTZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IMST (Bitwise Funds Trust) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IMST returned -67.20% vs 159.07% for MSTZ. Their -0.95 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IMST charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

IMST vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IMST having a -30.61% return and MSTZ slightly higher at -30.44%.

IMST

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -5.61%
• 6M: -31.75%
• YTD: -30.61%
• 1Y: -67.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -52.56%

MSTZ

• 1D: 8.95%
• 1M: 7.38%
• 6M: -24.16%
• YTD: -30.44%
• 1Y: 159.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -86.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust	$166.01K	$154.83K	$265.20K
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	$101.73M	$133.33M	$177.41M

IMST vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust	-30.61%	-46.36%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-30.44%	45.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IMST and MSTZ is -0.95, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	-0.95

The correlation between IMST and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.95 to -0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IMST vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMST

IMST Risk / Return Rank: 0
IMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
IMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
IMST Omega Ratio Rank: 0
IMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
IMST Martin Ratio Rank: 1

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 61
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMST vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMST	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	1.38	-2.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.30	2.22	-4.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.28	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	2.44	-3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	4.53	-5.94

IMST vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMST Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMST and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMST vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMST drawdown since its inception was -75.63%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMST and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMST	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.63%	-99.38%	+23.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.94%	-84.89%	+11.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.85%	-97.63%	+24.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.52%	-94.63%	+55.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.26%	45.62%	+4.64%

Volatility

IMST vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) is 9.69%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that IMST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMST	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.69%	37.86%	-28.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.17%	134.52%	-89.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.00%	150.23%	-90.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.75%	169.87%	-110.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.75%	169.87%	-110.12%

IMST vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMST vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

IMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 209.43%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust	209.43%	195.93%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMST and MSTZ in my portfolio?

IMST and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.95, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMST or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to IMST (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMST dropped -75.63% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, IMST or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 159.07% vs -67.20% for IMST. On fees, IMST is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IMST has been the lower-risk option at 9.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMST or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 159.07% return vs -67.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMST or MSTZ?

IMST is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMST or MSTZ?

IMST has the higher dividend yield at 209.43%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between IMST and MSTZ?

IMST is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IMST and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.