IMST vs. BITO
IMST (Bitwise Funds Trust) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IMST returned -66.17% vs -42.09% for BITO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
IMST vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMST achieves a -25.05% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -29.93% return.
IMST
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -26.67%
- YTD
- -25.05%
- 6M
- -27.13%
- 1Y
- -66.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITO
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -29.93%
- 6M
- -30.03%
- 1Y
- -42.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMST vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust | -25.05% | -46.36% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -29.93% | -2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMST and BITO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IMST and BITO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMST vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
IMST
BITO
IMST vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMST | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.85 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.80 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -1.35 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMST vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMST drawdown since its inception was -70.68%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMST and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMST | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.68% | -77.86% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.68% | -53.10% | -17.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.68% | -51.67% | -19.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.57% | -36.86% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.73% | 31.28% | +17.45% |
Volatility
IMST vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) has a higher volatility of 17.47% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 12.79%. This indicates that IMST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMST | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.47% | 12.79% | +4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.16% | 34.39% | +9.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.04% | 44.08% | +13.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.62% | 55.02% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.62% | 55.02% | +4.60% |
IMST vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMST vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
IMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 251.60%, more than BITO's 71.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 71.07% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust | 251.60% | 195.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMST and BITO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMST has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to BITO (12.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMST dropped -70.68% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 1-year performance, BITO leads with -42.09% vs -66.17% for IMST. On fees, BITO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 12.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITO has performed better with a -42.09% return vs -66.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IMST.
IMST has the higher dividend yield at 251.60%, compared with 71.07% for BITO.
IMST is categorized as Derivative Income, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IMST and 0.95% for BITO.
BITO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.96 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMST and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer