PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMST vs. BITB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMST vs. BITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) and Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMST achieves a -30.61% return, which is significantly lower than BITB's -28.24% return.


IMST

1D
0.56%
1M
-5.61%
6M
-31.75%
YTD
-30.61%
1Y
-67.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-52.56%

BITB

1D
-2.87%
1M
2.34%
6M
-25.01%
YTD
-28.24%
1Y
-44.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.99M$39.08M$56.07M
$166.01K$154.83K$265.20K

IMST vs. BITB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IMST
Bitwise Funds Trust
-30.61%-46.36%
BITB
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF
-28.24%0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IMST and BITB is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.79

The correlation between IMST and BITB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMST vs. BITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMST
IMST Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
IMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMST Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
IMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMST Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BITB
BITB Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITB Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITB Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMST vs. BITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) and Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMSTBITBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.83

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.87

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

-1.34

-0.07

IMST vs. BITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMST Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is comparable to the BITB Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMST and BITB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMST vs. BITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMST drawdown since its inception was -75.63%, which is greater than BITB's maximum drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMST and BITB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMSTBITBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.63%

-53.33%

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.94%

-53.33%

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.85%

-50.01%

-22.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.52%

-18.25%

-21.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.26%

34.64%

+15.62%

Volatility

IMST vs. BITB - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) has a higher volatility of 9.69% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) at 9.04%. This indicates that IMST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMSTBITBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.69%

9.04%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.17%

33.71%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.00%

44.37%

+15.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.75%

49.38%

+10.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.75%

49.38%

+10.37%

IMST vs. BITB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BITB's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMST vs. BITB - Dividend Comparison

IMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 209.43%, while BITB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BITB
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%
IMST
Bitwise Funds Trust
209.43%195.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMST and BITB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMST has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to BITB (9.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMST dropped -75.63% vs BITB's -53.33%.

On 1-year performance, BITB leads with -44.51% vs -67.20% for IMST. On fees, BITB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BITB has been the lower-risk option at 9.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITB has performed better with a -44.51% return vs -67.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IMST.

IMST has the higher dividend yield at 209.43%, compared with 0.00% for BITB.

IMST is categorized as Derivative Income, while BITB is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IMST and 0.20% for BITB.

BITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.05 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMST and BITB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer