IMPUY vs. CCJ
IMPUY (Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. IMPUY operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, IMPUY returned 11.93%/yr vs 26.30%/yr for CCJ. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
IMPUY vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMPUY achieves a -28.66% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's -1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IMPUY has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 11.93%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 26.30% annualized return.
IMPUY
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- 6M
- -37.44%
- YTD
- -28.66%
- 1Y
- 17.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- -5.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.86%
CCJ
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- 6M
- -25.36%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- 23.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.14%
- 5Y*
- 40.03%
- 10Y*
- 26.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $338.43M | $345.52M | $347.83M | |
| $1.49M | $1.71M | $2.57M |
IMPUY vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMPUY Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR | -28.66% | 236.44% | -4.39% | -58.79% | -4.08% | 10.90% | 42.27% | 307.97% | -3.09% | -17.99% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | -1.93% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMPUY and CCJ is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.28 |
The correlation between IMPUY and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (10 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IMPUY:
$9.86B
CCJ:
$39.08B
IMPUY:
-ZAR 10.32
CCJ:
CA$0.82
IMPUY:
0.87
CCJ:
15.77
IMPUY:
1.68
CCJ:
7.68
IMPUY:
ZAR 186.32B
CCJ:
CA$3.47B
IMPUY:
ZAR 14.03B
CCJ:
CA$969.30M
IMPUY:
ZAR 28.96B
CCJ:
CA$863.75M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMPUY vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
IMPUY
CCJ
IMPUY vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR (IMPUY) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMPUY | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.12 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 0.63 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | 1.45 | -0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMPUY vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMPUY drawdown since its inception was -82.06%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMPUY and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMPUY | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.06% | -87.53% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.62% | -36.93% | -18.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.62% | -40.01% | -15.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.49% | -40.01% | -41.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.06% | -57.22% | -24.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.18% | -33.09% | -19.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -46.00% | +7.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.94% | 16.04% | +12.90% |
Volatility
IMPUY vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR (IMPUY) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 12.67%. This indicates that IMPUY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMPUY | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.02% | 12.67% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.30% | 38.73% | +16.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.48% | 55.97% | +16.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.96% | 49.96% | +12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.16% | 46.78% | +15.38% |
Dividends
IMPUY vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
IMPUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than CCJ's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
IMPUY Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR | 3.06% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 6.42% | 7.65% | 9.50% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
IMPUY vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMPUY vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison
IMPUY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR reported a gross profit of 12.80B and revenue of 57.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.
CCJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 171.48M and revenue of 814.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
IMPUY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR reported an operating income of 12.79B and revenue of 57.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.
CCJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 84.74M and revenue of 814.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.
IMPUY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR reported a net income of 8.87B and revenue of 57.89B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.
CCJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 25.23M and revenue of 814.12M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMPUY and CCJ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMPUY has higher volatility (17.02%) compared to CCJ (12.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMPUY dropped -82.06% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMPUY and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer