PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMPUY vs. BG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMPUY vs. BG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR (IMPUY) and Bunge Limited (BG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMPUY achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than BG's 49.26% return. Over the past 10 years, IMPUY has outperformed BG with an annualized return of 18.56%, while BG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.10% annualized return.


IMPUY

1D
-5.23%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
-13.46%
6M
7.19%
1Y
90.87%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
-2.55%
10Y*
18.56%

BG

1D
1.77%
1M
3.59%
YTD
49.26%
6M
39.53%
1Y
77.15%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMPUY vs. BG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMPUY
Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR
-13.46%236.44%-4.39%-58.79%-4.08%10.90%42.27%307.97%-3.09%-17.99%
BG
Bunge Limited
49.26%18.56%-20.74%3.79%9.28%46.77%18.92%11.77%-17.99%-4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IMPUY and BG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMPUY:

$11.99B

BG:

$25.76B

EPS

IMPUY:

-$10.34

BG:

$4.12

PS Ratio

IMPUY:

0.06

BG:

0.27

PB Ratio

IMPUY:

0.12

BG:

1.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMPUY:

$186.32B

BG:

$80.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMPUY:

$14.03B

BG:

$3.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMPUY:

$28.96B

BG:

$2.19B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMPUY vs. BG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMPUY
IMPUY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IMPUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMPUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMPUY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IMPUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMPUY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BG
BG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMPUY vs. BG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR (IMPUY) and Bunge Limited (BG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMPUYBGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

5.04

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

14.09

-9.65

IMPUY vs. BG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMPUY Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the BG Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMPUY and BG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMPUYBGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.48

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.38

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.33

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.33

+0.07

Drawdowns

IMPUY vs. BG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMPUY drawdown since its inception was -82.06%, which is greater than BG's maximum drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMPUY and BG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMPUYBGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.06%

-77.34%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.16%

-15.39%

-28.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.00%

-38.82%

-24.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.49%

-41.49%

-40.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.06%

-60.49%

-21.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.98%

0.00%

-41.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.50%

-28.91%

-9.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.58%

5.50%

+15.08%

Volatility

IMPUY vs. BG - Volatility Comparison

Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR (IMPUY) has a higher volatility of 21.21% compared to Bunge Limited (BG) at 8.83%. This indicates that IMPUY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMPUYBGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.21%

8.83%

+12.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.51%

19.24%

+37.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.89%

31.41%

+38.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.06%

29.26%

+31.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.91%

30.99%

+30.92%

Dividends

IMPUY vs. BG - Dividend Comparison

IMPUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than BG's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BG
Bunge Limited
2.15%3.12%3.48%2.55%2.31%2.76%3.05%3.48%3.59%2.62%2.21%2.11%
IMPUY
Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR
2.52%0.60%0.00%6.42%7.65%9.50%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IMPUY vs. BG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR and Bunge Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B202120222023202420252026
57.89B
21.86B
(IMPUY) Total Revenue
(BG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IMPUY vs. BG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR and Bunge Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202120222023202420252026
22.1%
3.5%
Portfolio components
IMPUY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR reported a gross profit of 12.80B and revenue of 57.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.

BG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported a gross profit of 766.00M and revenue of 21.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.

IMPUY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR reported an operating income of 12.79B and revenue of 57.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.

BG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported an operating income of 235.00M and revenue of 21.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

IMPUY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Limited ADR reported a net income of 8.87B and revenue of 57.89B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.

BG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported a net income of 68.00M and revenue of 21.86B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMPUY and BG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMPUY has higher volatility (21.21%) compared to BG (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMPUY dropped -82.06% vs BG's -77.34%.

BG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMPUY and BG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer