PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMOM vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMOM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 38.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has underperformed PIE with an annualized return of 7.38%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.


IMOM

1D
-2.92%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
13.79%
6M
13.08%
1Y
36.25%
3Y*
23.30%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
7.38%

PIE

1D
-5.18%
1M
2.84%
YTD
38.60%
6M
34.63%
1Y
63.22%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMOM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
13.79%47.20%5.22%9.15%-21.92%-0.75%28.39%18.26%-23.07%34.83%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
38.60%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOM and PIE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.59

The correlation between IMOM and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMOM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMOM
PIE

Industrials

31.2%
15.3%

Technology

18.7%
51.1%

Basic Materials

14.5%
2.9%

Utilities

10.7%
1.1%

Energy

10.3%
4.6%

Communication Services

6.3%
1.3%

Financial Services

4.2%
14.1%

Real Estate

4.2%
3.5%

Healthcare

3.3%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Industrials

IMOM
31.2%
PIE
15.3%

Technology

IMOM
18.7%
PIE
51.1%

Basic Materials

IMOM
14.5%
PIE
2.9%

Utilities

IMOM
10.7%
PIE
1.1%

Energy

IMOM
10.3%
PIE
4.6%

Communication Services

IMOM
6.3%
PIE
1.3%

Financial Services

IMOM
4.2%
PIE
14.1%

Real Estate

IMOM
4.2%
PIE
3.5%

Healthcare

IMOM
3.3%
PIE
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IMOM
1.7%
PIE
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

IMOM

-

PIE
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMOM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMOM
IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMOM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMOMPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

6.44

-4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.33

20.03

-10.70

IMOM vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOM and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMOM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOMPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.74%

-72.98%

+27.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.61%

-9.87%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.51%

-28.69%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.27%

-40.32%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.74%

-40.32%

-5.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-5.18%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-26.01%

+11.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

3.17%

+0.73%

Volatility

IMOM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) is 8.35%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 13.28%. This indicates that IMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOMPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

13.28%

-4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.24%

21.21%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

24.30%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.07%

20.85%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

21.57%

-1.29%

IMOM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMOM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than PIE's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
2.22%2.53%4.52%2.95%6.06%1.27%0.59%1.17%0.78%1.11%0.54%0.00%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.74%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMOM and PIE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to IMOM (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 10.46% vs 7.38% for IMOM. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IMOM has been the lower-risk option at 8.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

IMOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.74% for PIE.

IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMOM and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer