IMOM vs. JMOM
IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - IMOM tracks the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR) while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMOM returned 8.09%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for JMOM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMOM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
IMOM vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 21.70% return.
IMOM
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 36.25%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
JMOM
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 21.70%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 34.10%
- 3Y*
- 27.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- —
IMOM vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 13.79% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 9.15% | -21.92% | -0.75% | 28.39% | 18.26% | -23.07% | 0.65% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 21.70% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMOM and JMOM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IMOM and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMOM vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMOM
JMOM
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
IMOM
JMOM
Technology
IMOM
JMOM
Basic Materials
IMOM
JMOM
Utilities
IMOM
JMOM
Energy
IMOM
JMOM
Communication Services
IMOM
JMOM
Financial Services
IMOM
JMOM
Real Estate
IMOM
JMOM
Healthcare
IMOM
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
IMOM
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
IMOM
-
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMOM vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
IMOM
JMOM
IMOM vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMOM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 4.35 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 19.57 | -10.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMOM vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMOM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -34.31% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -7.87% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -19.51% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.27% | -28.26% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -2.53% | -3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.13% | -6.29% | -7.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 1.75% | +2.15% |
Volatility
IMOM vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) at 7.29%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMOM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | 7.29% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 13.12% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 15.69% | +5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 18.87% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 20.19% | +0.09% |
IMOM vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMOM vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than JMOM's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.22% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMOM and JMOM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMOM has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to JMOM (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 15.10% vs 8.09% for IMOM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.
IMOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.72% for JMOM.
IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMOM and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer