PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMOAX vs. PALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMOAX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund (IMOAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMOAX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 6.25% return.


IMOAX

1D
-0.84%
1M
0.15%
YTD
4.18%
6M
3.56%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
6.90%

PALDX

1D
-0.93%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
6.25%
6M
5.43%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMOAX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMOAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund
4.18%14.86%9.81%12.66%-16.03%7.92%14.66%14.68%-6.22%2.78%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
6.25%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-4.12%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOAX and PALDX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017

0.91

The correlation between IMOAX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMOAX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMOAX
IMOAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IMOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMOAX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund (IMOAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMOAXPALDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.08

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

14.21

-4.53

IMOAX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOAX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMOAX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOAX drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOAX and PALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOAXPALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.71%

-26.16%

-11.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-5.96%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.37%

-16.06%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

-20.47%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.52%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-4.07%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.29%

+0.12%

Volatility

IMOAX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund (IMOAX) is 3.15%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that IMOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOAXPALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

3.35%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.71%

6.79%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.17%

8.40%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.26%

12.18%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.97%

12.70%

-3.73%

IMOAX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMOAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMOAX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

IMOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than PALDX's 5.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMOAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund
6.06%6.31%4.98%3.65%1.55%8.17%4.08%5.74%10.16%7.86%5.53%6.74%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.10%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IMOAX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PALDX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to IMOAX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOAX dropped -37.71% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMOAX and PALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer