PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMO vs. TS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMO vs. TS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Tenaris S.A. (TS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMO achieves a 33.46% return, which is significantly lower than TS's 54.22% return. Over the past 10 years, IMO has outperformed TS with an annualized return of 17.09%, while TS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.


IMO

1D
1.30%
1M
-13.97%
YTD
33.46%
6M
35.20%
1Y
43.79%
3Y*
36.88%
5Y*
31.93%
10Y*
17.09%

TS

1D
1.63%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
54.22%
6M
55.39%
1Y
65.10%
3Y*
31.84%
5Y*
25.34%
10Y*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMO vs. TS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
33.46%43.85%10.47%20.89%38.00%95.29%-25.37%7.16%-17.21%-8.36%
TS
Tenaris S.A.
54.22%4.98%12.88%2.63%73.26%34.03%-28.87%9.68%-31.51%-6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IMO and TS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2002

0.57

The correlation between IMO and TS shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMO:

$55.27B

TS:

$14.56B

EPS

IMO:

$5.87

TS:

$4.26

PE Ratio

IMO:

19.43

TS:

13.65

PEG Ratio

IMO:

0.43

TS:

0.37

PS Ratio

IMO:

1.22

TS:

2.21

PB Ratio

IMO:

2.43

TS:

0.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMO:

$46.55B

TS:

$12.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMO:

$7.69B

TS:

$3.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMO:

$6.36B

TS:

$3.16B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMO vs. TS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMO
IMO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TS
TS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMO vs. TS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Tenaris S.A. (TS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMOTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

4.93

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

12.97

-5.77

IMO vs. TS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the TS Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMO and TS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMO vs. TS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMO drawdown since its inception was -84.82%, roughly equal to the maximum TS drawdown of -83.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO and TS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.82%

-83.34%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.23%

-13.28%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.95%

-29.81%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.72%

-33.71%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.96%

-76.21%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.17%

-9.17%

-8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.18%

-36.74%

+15.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

5.04%

+1.07%

Volatility

IMO vs. TS - Volatility Comparison

Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Tenaris S.A. (TS) have volatilities of 9.50% and 9.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

9.54%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.86%

21.71%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.43%

28.97%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.57%

33.65%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.59%

36.82%

-1.23%

Dividends

IMO vs. TS - Dividend Comparison

IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than TS's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
2.02%2.40%2.84%2.73%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.36%2.02%1.70%1.66%
TS
Tenaris S.A.
3.06%2.96%3.55%3.11%2.56%2.59%0.88%3.62%3.85%4.39%2.41%3.78%

Financials

IMO vs. TS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Oil Limited and Tenaris S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
12.45B
3.11B
(IMO) Total Revenue
(TS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IMO vs. TS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Imperial Oil Limited and Tenaris S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
20.2%
33.9%
Portfolio components
IMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a gross profit of 2.51B and revenue of 12.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.

TS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenaris S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 3.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

IMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

TS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenaris S.A. reported an operating income of 585.67M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

IMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a net income of 940.00M and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

TS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenaris S.A. reported a net income of 542.67M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMO and TS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TS has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to IMO (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMO dropped -84.82% vs TS's -83.34%.

TS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMO and TS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer