PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMO vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMO vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMO achieves a 41.99% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IMO has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 17.61%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.99% annualized return.


IMO

1D
0.26%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
41.99%
6M
33.35%
1Y
56.95%
3Y*
37.72%
5Y*
32.35%
10Y*
17.61%

SLV

1D
0.77%
1M
-22.76%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
9.25%
1Y
85.39%
3Y*
41.27%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMO vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
41.99%43.85%10.47%20.89%38.00%95.29%-25.37%7.16%-17.21%-8.36%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.86%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IMO and SLV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.26

The correlation between IMO and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMO vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMO
IMO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMO vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMOSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.89

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

4.10

+5.94

IMO vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMO and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMO vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMO drawdown since its inception was -84.82%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.82%

-76.28%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.51%

-45.40%

+28.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.95%

-45.40%

+22.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.72%

-45.40%

+15.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.96%

-45.40%

-31.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.88%

-41.96%

+30.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.19%

-44.66%

+23.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

20.88%

-15.19%

Volatility

IMO vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) is 9.97%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that IMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.97%

16.34%

-6.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.21%

59.10%

-36.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.31%

59.82%

-32.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.66%

36.46%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.55%

32.00%

+3.55%

Dividends

IMO vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
1.90%2.40%2.84%2.73%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.36%2.02%1.70%1.66%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMO and SLV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to IMO (9.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMO dropped -84.82% vs SLV's -76.28%.

IMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMO and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer