PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMMR vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMMR vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IMMR has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 1.41%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.40% annualized return.


IMMR

1D
4.71%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.39%
6M
-3.03%
1Y
-10.21%
3Y*
-2.01%
5Y*
-3.62%
10Y*
1.41%

SPYM

1D
0.24%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.75%
6M
8.78%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMMR vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
0.39%-18.30%26.47%3.43%23.12%-49.42%51.95%-17.08%26.91%-33.58%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.75%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IMMR and SPYM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.39

The correlation between IMMR and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMMR vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMMR
IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMMR vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMMRSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.38

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

2.81

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.61

12.97

-13.58

IMMR vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMMR and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMMRSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

2.08

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.81

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.86

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.61

-0.65

Drawdowns

IMMR vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMMRSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.66%

-54.46%

-44.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.86%

-8.90%

-21.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.90%

-18.72%

-38.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.90%

-24.48%

-32.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.29%

-33.87%

-40.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.65%

-2.66%

-86.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.21%

-7.15%

-81.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.77%

1.92%

+14.85%

Volatility

IMMR vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a higher volatility of 12.61% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.72%. This indicates that IMMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMMRSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.61%

3.72%

+8.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.21%

9.30%

+17.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.79%

12.07%

+27.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.83%

16.84%

+28.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.32%

18.02%

+33.30%

Dividends

IMMR vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than SPYM's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
3.60%5.59%2.06%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMMR and SPYM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMMR has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to SPYM (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMMR dropped -98.66% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMMR and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer