PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMMR vs. SHIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMMR vs. SHIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than SHIP's 82.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IMMR has outperformed SHIP with an annualized return of 1.36%, while SHIP has yielded a comparatively lower -41.99% annualized return.


IMMR

1D
-1.51%
1M
2.35%
YTD
-1.57%
6M
-3.13%
1Y
-11.50%
3Y*
-2.27%
5Y*
-3.44%
10Y*
1.36%

SHIP

1D
6.03%
1M
3.44%
YTD
82.14%
6M
73.58%
1Y
153.69%
3Y*
65.24%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
-41.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMMR vs. SHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
-1.57%-18.30%26.47%3.43%23.12%-49.42%51.95%-17.08%26.91%-33.58%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
82.14%38.48%-3.81%61.04%-36.53%70.83%-93.89%-92.71%-51.66%-9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IMMR and SHIP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2007

0.09

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMMR:

$1.47B

SHIP:

$158.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMMR:

$409.86M

SHIP:

$62.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

IMMR:

$188.76M

SHIP:

$78.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMMR vs. SHIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMMR
IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMMR vs. SHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMMRSHIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.50

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

8.33

-8.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

20.43

-21.11

IMMR vs. SHIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the SHIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMMR and SHIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMMR vs. SHIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, roughly equal to the maximum SHIP drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and SHIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMMRSHIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.66%

-100.00%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.86%

-18.56%

-12.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.90%

-57.61%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.90%

-69.11%

+12.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.29%

-99.98%

+25.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.85%

-99.98%

+10.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.20%

-86.56%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.89%

7.55%

+9.34%

Volatility

IMMR vs. SHIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is 12.99%, while Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that IMMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMMRSHIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.99%

16.12%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.57%

33.91%

-6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.99%

42.69%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.85%

51.91%

-6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.32%

98.54%

-47.22%

Dividends

IMMR vs. SHIP - Dividend Comparison

IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than SHIP's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
3.67%5.59%2.06%3.12%0.00%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
2.60%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%

Financials

IMMR vs. SHIP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Immersion Corporation and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
281.38M
49.42M
(IMMR) Total Revenue
(SHIP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IMMR and SHIP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHIP has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to IMMR (12.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMMR dropped -98.66% vs SHIP's -100.00%.

SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMMR and SHIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer