PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMMR vs. RDVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMMR vs. RDVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than RDVT's -6.08% return.


IMMR

1D
4.71%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.39%
6M
-3.03%
1Y
-10.21%
3Y*
-2.01%
5Y*
-3.62%
10Y*
1.41%

RDVT

1D
1.00%
1M
7.63%
YTD
-6.08%
6M
-3.98%
1Y
17.20%
3Y*
36.51%
5Y*
19.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMMR vs. RDVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
0.39%-18.30%26.47%3.43%23.12%-49.42%51.95%-17.08%-26.68%
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
-6.08%58.63%81.27%-13.25%-42.00%52.01%41.06%174.63%-85.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IMMR and RDVT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.23

The correlation between IMMR and RDVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMMR:

$1.47B

RDVT:

$94.08M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMMR:

$409.86M

RDVT:

$79.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

IMMR:

$188.76M

RDVT:

$23.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMMR vs. RDVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMMR
IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVT
RDVT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RDVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMMR vs. RDVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMMRRDVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.10

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

0.41

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.61

0.91

-1.52

IMMR vs. RDVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the RDVT Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMMR and RDVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMMRRDVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

0.38

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.41

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.03

-0.07

Drawdowns

IMMR vs. RDVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than RDVT's maximum drawdown of -90.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and RDVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMMRRDVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.66%

-90.17%

-8.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.86%

-42.11%

+11.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.90%

-42.11%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.90%

-63.73%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.65%

-9.98%

-79.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.21%

-50.47%

-37.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.77%

18.92%

-2.15%

Volatility

IMMR vs. RDVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is 12.61%, while Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) has a volatility of 15.61%. This indicates that IMMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMMRRDVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.61%

15.61%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.21%

37.64%

-10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.79%

46.14%

-6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.83%

49.36%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.32%

68.31%

-16.99%

Dividends

IMMR vs. RDVT - Dividend Comparison

IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
3.60%5.59%2.06%3.12%
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
0.00%0.53%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IMMR vs. RDVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Immersion Corporation and Red Violet, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
281.38M
25.83M
(IMMR) Total Revenue
(RDVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IMMR and RDVT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVT has higher volatility (15.61%) compared to IMMR (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMMR dropped -98.66% vs RDVT's -90.17%.

RDVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMMR and RDVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer