IMMR vs. ACGL
IMMR (Immersion Corporation) and ACGL (Arch Capital Group Ltd.) are both stocks. IMMR operates in Software - Application (Technology), while ACGL operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, IMMR returned -0.13%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for ACGL. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IMMR vs. ACGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly higher than ACGL's -4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IMMR has underperformed ACGL with an annualized return of -0.13%, while ACGL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.45% annualized return.
IMMR
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- -11.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.03%
- 10Y*
- -0.13%
ACGL
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -4.05%
- 6M
- -5.23%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 20.32%
- 10Y*
- 15.45%
IMMR vs. ACGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | -1.42% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 23.12% | -49.42% | 51.95% | -17.08% | 26.91% | -33.58% |
ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | -4.05% | 3.87% | 30.76% | 18.30% | 41.24% | 23.23% | -15.90% | 60.52% | -11.69% | 5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMMR and ACGL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1999 | 0.15 |
The correlation between IMMR and ACGL shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IMMR:
$1.47B
ACGL:
$19.70B
IMMR:
$409.86M
ACGL:
$8.44B
IMMR:
$188.76M
ACGL:
$5.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMMR vs. ACGL — Risk / Return Rank
IMMR
ACGL
IMMR vs. ACGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMMR | ACGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 0.15 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 0.38 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMMR vs. ACGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than ACGL's maximum drawdown of -54.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and ACGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMMR | ACGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -54.70% | -43.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.86% | -14.08% | -16.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.90% | -22.43% | -34.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.90% | -22.43% | -34.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.29% | -53.84% | -20.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.84% | -15.73% | -74.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.20% | -11.72% | -76.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.03% | 5.42% | +11.61% |
Volatility
IMMR vs. ACGL - Volatility Comparison
Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a higher volatility of 13.11% compared to Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) at 6.71%. This indicates that IMMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMMR | ACGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.11% | 6.71% | +6.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.42% | 14.73% | +12.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 20.66% | +19.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.72% | 24.53% | +21.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.07% | 27.56% | +23.51% |
Dividends
IMMR vs. ACGL - Dividend Comparison
IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, while ACGL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.41% | 0.00% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 3.66% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% |
Financials
IMMR vs. ACGL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Immersion Corporation and Arch Capital Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IMMR and ACGL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (13.11%) compared to ACGL (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMMR dropped -98.66% vs ACGL's -54.70%.
ACGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMMR and ACGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer