ACGL vs. NVDA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).

Performance

ACGL vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ACGL vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd.	0.07%	3.87%	30.76%	18.30%	41.24%	23.23%	-15.90%	60.52%	-11.69%	5.19%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	-6.48%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACGL : $36.10B NVDA : $4.26T
EPS ACGL : $11.66 NVDA : $4.90
PE Ratio ACGL : 8.23 NVDA : 35.61
PEG Ratio ACGL : 0.18 NVDA : 0.20
PS Ratio ACGL : 1.87 NVDA : 19.80
PB Ratio ACGL : 1.54 NVDA : 27.09
Total Revenue (TTM) ACGL : $19.32B NVDA : $215.94B
Gross Profit (TTM) ACGL : $7.58B NVDA : $153.46B
EBITDA (TTM) ACGL : $5.38B NVDA : $144.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACGL achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGL has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 15.42%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.61% annualized return.

ACGL

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -4.15%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: -0.20%
• 3Y*: 14.15%
• 5Y*: 20.70%
• 10Y*: 15.42%

NVDA

• 1D: 5.59%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: -6.48%
• 6M: -6.52%
• 1Y: 60.95%
• 3Y*: 84.54%
• 5Y*: 66.14%
• 10Y*: 69.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ACGL vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACGL

ACGL Risk / Return Rank: 40
ACGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ACGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ACGL Omega Ratio Rank: 34
ACGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ACGL Martin Ratio Rank: 44

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 83
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACGL vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACGL	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	1.48	-1.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	2.17	-2.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.27	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	2.92	-2.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.16	7.39	-7.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACGL vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACGL Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACGL and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACGL	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	1.48	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	1.29	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	1.40	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.61	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between ACGL and NVDA is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ACGL vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ACGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	5.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Drawdowns

ACGL vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACGL drawdown since its inception was -54.70%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGL and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACGL	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.70%	-89.72%	+35.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.50%	-20.21%	+7.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.43%	-66.34%	+43.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.84%	-66.34%	+12.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.11%	-15.76%	+3.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.71%	-36.40%	+24.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.23%	7.99%	-1.76%

Volatility

ACGL vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) is 5.07%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that ACGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACGL	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	10.46%	-5.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.70%	25.91%	-12.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.82%	41.44%	-17.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.43%	51.74%	-27.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.43%	49.85%	-22.42%

Financials

ACGL vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arch Capital Group Ltd. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ACGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arch Capital Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 4.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 51.09B and revenue of 68.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.0%.

ACGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arch Capital Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.45B and revenue of 4.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 44.30B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.0%.

ACGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arch Capital Group Ltd. reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 4.78B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 42.96B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in a net margin of 63.1%.