ACGL vs. KBWP

In the year-to-date period, ACGL achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than KBWP's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGL has outperformed KBWP with an annualized return of 16.75%, while KBWP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.84% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ACGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the KBWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACGL and KBWP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ACGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than KBWP's 1.77% yield.

The maximum ACGL drawdown since its inception was -54.73%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGL and KBWP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) at 11.44%. This indicates that ACGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.