PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ACGL vs. KBWP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ACGL and KBWP is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

ACGL vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-14.99%
1.53%
ACGL
KBWP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACGL:

0.37

KBWP:

0.82

Sortino Ratio

ACGL:

0.67

KBWP:

1.21

Omega Ratio

ACGL:

1.08

KBWP:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

ACGL:

0.44

KBWP:

1.12

Martin Ratio

ACGL:

1.01

KBWP:

3.05

Ulcer Index

ACGL:

8.48%

KBWP:

4.50%

Daily Std Dev

ACGL:

23.20%

KBWP:

16.68%

Max Drawdown

ACGL:

-54.73%

KBWP:

-39.77%

Current Drawdown

ACGL:

-19.31%

KBWP:

-10.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACGL achieves a -4.57% return, which is significantly lower than KBWP's -2.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGL has outperformed KBWP with an annualized return of 16.73%, while KBWP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.43% annualized return.


ACGL

YTD

-4.57%

1M

-5.45%

6M

-14.99%

1Y

7.99%

5Y*

14.52%

10Y*

16.73%

KBWP

YTD

-2.77%

1M

-1.03%

6M

1.53%

1Y

12.63%

5Y*

11.30%

10Y*

12.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACGL vs. KBWP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACGL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACGL is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACGL is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACGL is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACGL is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACGL is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACGL is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

KBWP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KBWP is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KBWP is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KBWP is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KBWP is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KBWP is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KBWP is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACGL vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACGL, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.370.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACGL, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.671.21
The chart of Omega ratio for ACGL, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.081.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACGL, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.441.12
The chart of Martin ratio for ACGL, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.013.05
ACGL
KBWP

The current ACGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the KBWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACGL and KBWP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.37
0.82
ACGL
KBWP

Dividends

ACGL vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison

ACGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than KBWP's 1.69% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACGL
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
5.67%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
1.69%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%2.73%

Drawdowns

ACGL vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACGL drawdown since its inception was -54.73%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGL and KBWP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-19.31%
-10.12%
ACGL
KBWP

Volatility

ACGL vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison

Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) at 4.53%. This indicates that ACGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.87%
4.53%
ACGL
KBWP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab