IMCVX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
IMCVX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 3, 2011. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
IMCVX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMCVX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCVX Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.33% | 4.09% | 10.72% | 9.44% | -11.52% | 29.40% | 2.62% | 40.50% | -15.20% | 15.06% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCVX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCVX having a 8.85% annualized return and FASGX not far behind at 8.70%.
IMCVX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 8.35%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMCVX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCVX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMCVX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
IMCVX
FASGX
IMCVX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMCVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 1.21 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 1.73 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 1.55 | -1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | 6.89 | -6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMCVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.21 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.53 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.70 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCVX and FASGX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMCVX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
IMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, more than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCVX Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund | 9.00% | 9.21% | 11.72% | 0.98% | 8.69% | 15.71% | 4.38% | 19.23% | 20.04% | 7.09% | 3.00% | 21.05% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
IMCVX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCVX drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCVX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -47.35% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.46% | -9.07% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.03% | -23.54% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -27.20% | -17.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -7.95% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -6.74% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 2.04% | +2.14% |
Volatility
IMCVX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) is 3.69%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that IMCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMCVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 4.57% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 7.78% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 12.82% | +6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 12.14% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 12.56% | +7.56% |