PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCVX vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCVX vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCVX achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than VOE's 11.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCVX has underperformed VOE with an annualized return of 9.97%, while VOE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.96% annualized return.


IMCVX

1D
0.30%
1M
1.62%
YTD
11.09%
6M
9.75%
1Y
16.00%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
9.97%

VOE

1D
0.12%
1M
1.41%
YTD
11.74%
6M
10.93%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
10.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCVX vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCVX
Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund
11.09%4.09%10.72%9.44%-11.52%29.40%2.62%40.50%-15.20%15.06%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
11.74%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCVX and VOE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.95

The correlation between IMCVX and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCVX vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCVX
IMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCVX vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCVXVOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.35

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

12.65

-4.06

IMCVX vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCVX and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCVX vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCVX drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCVX and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVXVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-61.50%

+17.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-6.93%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-18.45%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-19.70%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-43.18%

-1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-1.07%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-8.33%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.83%

+0.37%

Volatility

IMCVX vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) is 3.17%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that IMCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVXVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

3.36%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

8.36%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

11.64%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

16.01%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

18.79%

+1.33%

IMCVX vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCVX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMCVX vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

IMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than VOE's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCVX
Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund
8.29%9.21%11.72%0.98%8.69%15.71%4.38%19.23%20.04%7.09%3.00%21.05%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.86%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCVX and VOE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOE has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to IMCVX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCVX dropped -44.22% vs VOE's -61.50%.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCVX and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer