ILS vs. MTBA
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA).
ILS and MTBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILS is an actively managed fund by Brookmont. It was launched on Mar 31, 2025. MTBA is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Nov 6, 2023.
Performance
ILS vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ILS vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 1.04% | 5.60% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.43% | 4.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILS achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's -0.43% return.
ILS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTBA
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILS vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ILS vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank
ILS
MTBA
ILS vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILS | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.92 | 1.37 | +0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between ILS and MTBA is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ILS vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison
ILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than MTBA's 6.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 8.15% | 6.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.08% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
ILS vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILS drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum MTBA drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILS and MTBA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILS | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -3.48% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.80% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -0.74% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility
ILS vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ILS | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 3.33% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 3.97% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 3.97% | -0.44% |