PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILDR vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILDR vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


ILDR

1D
-1.06%
1M
13.98%
YTD
21.58%
6M
21.69%
1Y
47.41%
3Y*
31.44%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILDR vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
21.58%29.22%29.31%39.34%-34.95%7.29%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ILDR and KNG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between ILDR and KNG has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ILDR vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILDR
KNG

Technology

45.2%
4.3%

Healthcare

14.7%
10.1%

Industrials

12.8%
20.3%

Communication Services

10.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
5.5%

Financial Services

3.1%
12.7%

Energy

2.0%
3.0%

Utilities

1.9%
6.1%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

23.5%

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Technology

ILDR
45.2%
KNG
4.3%

Healthcare

ILDR
14.7%
KNG
10.1%

Industrials

ILDR
12.8%
KNG
20.3%

Communication Services

ILDR
10.2%
KNG

-

Consumer Cyclical

ILDR
10.2%
KNG
5.5%

Financial Services

ILDR
3.1%
KNG
12.7%

Energy

ILDR
2.0%
KNG
3.0%

Utilities

ILDR
1.9%
KNG
6.1%

Basic Materials

ILDR

-

KNG
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

ILDR

-

KNG
23.5%

Real Estate

ILDR

-

KNG
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILDR vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILDR
ILDR Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ILDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILDR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ILDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILDR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILDR vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILDRKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.13

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

0.87

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.00

2.25

+6.75

ILDR vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILDRKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

0.73

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.32

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.49

+0.07

Drawdowns

ILDR vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILDRKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.61%

-35.12%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-8.61%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.43%

-14.24%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.61%

-18.20%

-26.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-5.89%

+4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.98%

-4.13%

-10.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

3.32%

+1.96%

Volatility

ILDR vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that ILDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILDRKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

2.29%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.21%

7.39%

+8.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.11%

10.19%

+10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.07%

13.59%

+12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

17.18%

+8.84%

ILDR vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ILDR and KNG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

ILDR vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILDR and KNG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILDR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILDR dropped -44.61% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, ILDR leads with 14.40% vs 4.31% for KNG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILDR has performed better with a 14.40% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILDR and KNG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for ILDR.

ILDR is categorized as Technology Equities, while KNG is Dividend.

ILDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILDR and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer