ILDR vs. ARMH
ILDR (First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ILDR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
ILDR vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ILDR
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 34.64%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- -9.46%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILDR vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | -1.85% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 19.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILDR and ARMH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILDR vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank
ILDR
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILDR vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILDR | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILDR vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILDR | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.61% | -24.85% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.20% | -16.34% | +9.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -7.72% | -7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.46% | — | — |
Volatility
ILDR vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILDR | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.16% | 122.02% | -98.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 122.02% | -95.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.24% | 122.02% | -95.78% |
ILDR vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILDR vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
Neither ILDR nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILDR and ARMH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ILDR.
ILDR and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ILDR and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for ILDR and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer