ILDR vs. ARMH
ILDR (First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ILDR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
ILDR vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ILDR
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 22.56%
- 3Y*
- 24.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.99%
ARMH
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -23.97%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $194.56K | $502.72K | $705.34K | |
| $1.72M | $2.15M | $1.99M |
ILDR vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | -5.03% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -22.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILDR and ARMH is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILDR vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank
ILDR
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILDR vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILDR | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILDR vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -48.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILDR | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.61% | -48.81% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.21% | -45.80% | +35.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.71% | -23.00% | +8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | — | — |
Volatility
ILDR vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILDR | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.43% | 99.09% | -74.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 99.09% | -72.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 99.09% | -72.82% |
ILDR vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILDR vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
Neither ILDR nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILDR and ARMH have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ILDR.
ILDR and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ILDR and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for ILDR and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer