PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. VTWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IJT having a 21.22% return and VTWG slightly lower at 20.43%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJT having a 11.60% annualized return and VTWG not far ahead at 12.12%.


IJT

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.51%
YTD
21.22%
6M
17.80%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
11.60%

VTWG

1D
-1.45%
1M
4.36%
YTD
20.43%
6M
16.97%
1Y
40.10%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. VTWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
21.22%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
20.43%13.07%15.15%18.90%-26.49%2.84%34.72%28.75%-9.45%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and VTWG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.93

The correlation between IJT and VTWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJT vs. VTWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJT
VTWG

Technology

21.2%
25.8%

Industrials

18.7%
23.1%

Healthcare

14.7%
22.0%

Financial Services

13.5%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
7.1%

Real Estate

6.5%
2.0%

Energy

3.8%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.2%

Utilities

1.7%
0.6%

Technology

IJT
21.2%
VTWG
25.8%

Industrials

IJT
18.7%
VTWG
23.1%

Healthcare

IJT
14.7%
VTWG
22.0%

Financial Services

IJT
13.5%
VTWG
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IJT
10.7%
VTWG
7.1%

Real Estate

IJT
6.5%
VTWG
2.0%

Energy

IJT
3.8%
VTWG
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

IJT
3.3%
VTWG
2.3%

Basic Materials

IJT
3.0%
VTWG
4.0%

Communication Services

IJT
2.9%
VTWG
2.2%

Utilities

IJT
1.7%
VTWG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. VTWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWG
VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJTVTWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.71

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

9.72

+2.51

IJT vs. VTWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the VTWG Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and VTWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJT vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than VTWG's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and VTWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTVTWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-42.07%

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-14.88%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-28.58%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-40.49%

+11.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-42.07%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-1.45%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-10.50%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

4.14%

-1.55%

Volatility

IJT vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 5.32%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTVTWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

7.82%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

16.92%

-3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

22.34%

-4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.55%

24.67%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

24.27%

-1.25%

IJT vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJT vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than VTWG's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.71%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.59%0.64%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IJT and VTWG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWG has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to IJT (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs VTWG's -42.07%.

On 10-year performance, VTWG leads with 12.12% vs 11.60% for IJT. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWG has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.

IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.59% for VTWG.

IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.06% for VTWG.

VTWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and VTWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer