PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 10.74%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


IJT

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.97%
YTD
15.36%
6M
13.60%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
10.74%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
15.36%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and SLV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.19

IJT vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJT
SLV

Technology

20.1%

-

Industrials

20.0%

-

Healthcare

14.5%

-

Financial Services

13.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Real Estate

6.3%

-

Energy

4.9%

-

Basic Materials

2.8%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%

-

Communication Services

2.7%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Technology

IJT
20.1%
SLV

-

Industrials

IJT
20.0%
SLV

-

Healthcare

IJT
14.5%
SLV

-

Financial Services

IJT
13.6%
SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IJT
9.8%
SLV

-

Real Estate

IJT
6.3%
SLV

-

Energy

IJT
4.9%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

IJT
2.8%
SLV
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

IJT
2.8%
SLV

-

Communication Services

IJT
2.7%
SLV

-

Utilities

IJT
1.9%
SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJTSLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

1.89

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

2.07

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.62

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.06

5.64

+4.42

IJT vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJTSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.89

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.58

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.49

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.25

+0.15

Drawdowns

IJT vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-76.28%

+18.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-42.45%

+33.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-42.45%

+15.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-42.45%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-42.81%

+0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-37.30%

+35.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-44.67%

+34.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

19.67%

-17.06%

Volatility

IJT vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 4.61%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

16.30%

-11.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

58.31%

-45.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

58.90%

-41.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

36.15%

-14.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

31.84%

-8.82%

IJT vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJT vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.77%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJT and SLV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IJT (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 10.74% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SLV is Silver. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer