PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


IJT

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.97%
YTD
15.36%
6M
13.60%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
10.74%

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
15.36%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.19

The correlation between IJT and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJT vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJT
OILK

Technology

20.1%

-

Industrials

20.0%

-

Healthcare

14.5%

-

Financial Services

13.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
100.0%

Real Estate

6.3%

-

Energy

4.9%

-

Basic Materials

2.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.8%

-

Communication Services

2.7%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Technology

IJT
20.1%
OILK

-

Industrials

IJT
20.0%
OILK

-

Healthcare

IJT
14.5%
OILK

-

Financial Services

IJT
13.6%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

IJT
9.8%
OILK
100.0%

Real Estate

IJT
6.3%
OILK

-

Energy

IJT
4.9%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

IJT
2.8%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

IJT
2.8%
OILK

-

Communication Services

IJT
2.7%
OILK

-

Utilities

IJT
1.9%
OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJTOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.42

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

6.91

+3.15

IJT vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJTOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.06

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.59

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.12

+0.28

Drawdowns

IJT vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-83.76%

+26.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-17.35%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-23.42%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-34.69%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-3.66%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-32.61%

+22.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

8.56%

-5.95%

Volatility

IJT vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 4.61%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

10.44%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

23.26%

-10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

28.75%

-11.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

30.12%

-8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

35.97%

-12.95%

IJT vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJT vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.77%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJT and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to IJT (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 5.43% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.77% for IJT.

IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer