IJT vs. OILK
IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJT is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJT returned 5.43%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IJT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
IJT vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
IJT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 26.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
IJT vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 15.36% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -4.40% | 14.47% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJT and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.19 |
The correlation between IJT and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJT vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJT
OILK
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IJT
OILK
-
Industrials
IJT
OILK
-
Healthcare
IJT
OILK
-
Financial Services
IJT
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
IJT
OILK
Real Estate
IJT
OILK
-
Energy
IJT
OILK
-
Basic Materials
IJT
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
IJT
OILK
-
Communication Services
IJT
OILK
-
Utilities
IJT
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJT vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
IJT
OILK
IJT vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJT | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 3.42 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 6.91 | +3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJT | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.06 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.59 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.12 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
IJT vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJT | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.61% | -83.76% | +26.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -17.35% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | -23.42% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -34.69% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -3.66% | +2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -32.61% | +22.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 8.56% | -5.95% |
Volatility
IJT vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 4.61%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJT | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 10.44% | -5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 23.26% | -10.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.56% | 28.75% | -11.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 30.12% | -8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 35.97% | -12.95% |
IJT vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJT vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.77% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJT and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to IJT (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 5.43% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.77% for IJT.
IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJT and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer