PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. NBGNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 24.48% return, which is significantly higher than NBGNX's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has outperformed NBGNX with an annualized return of 12.22%, while NBGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.


IJT

1D
1.41%
1M
6.31%
YTD
24.48%
6M
20.68%
1Y
35.26%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
12.22%

NBGNX

1D
1.40%
1M
3.13%
YTD
10.64%
6M
8.12%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. NBGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
24.48%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
10.64%-4.70%9.04%15.57%-19.49%18.07%24.86%29.47%-6.91%15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and NBGNX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.92

The correlation between IJT and NBGNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. NBGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGNX
NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJTNBGNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.12

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

0.95

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

2.52

+11.11

IJT vs. NBGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the NBGNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and NBGNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJT vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than NBGNX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and NBGNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTNBGNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-51.75%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-10.77%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-27.51%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-28.33%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-34.53%

-7.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.76%

+5.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.28%

-7.15%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

4.04%

-1.45%

Volatility

IJT vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) at 4.61%. This indicates that IJT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTNBGNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

4.61%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

11.65%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.95%

16.29%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.55%

19.70%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

20.21%

+2.81%

IJT vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJT vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than NBGNX's 14.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.69%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
14.78%16.36%2.15%3.03%11.05%10.92%3.84%5.82%12.24%13.89%11.21%18.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IJT and NBGNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJT has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to NBGNX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs NBGNX's -51.75%.

IJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and NBGNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer