PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NBGNX vs. DSCGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NBGNX and DSCGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

NBGNX vs. DSCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.09%
7.58%
NBGNX
DSCGX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NBGNX:

0.38

DSCGX:

0.82

Sortino Ratio

NBGNX:

0.67

DSCGX:

1.26

Omega Ratio

NBGNX:

1.08

DSCGX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

NBGNX:

0.35

DSCGX:

1.10

Martin Ratio

NBGNX:

1.18

DSCGX:

3.66

Ulcer Index

NBGNX:

5.58%

DSCGX:

3.83%

Daily Std Dev

NBGNX:

17.35%

DSCGX:

17.07%

Max Drawdown

NBGNX:

-51.48%

DSCGX:

-43.10%

Current Drawdown

NBGNX:

-11.64%

DSCGX:

-5.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBGNX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than DSCGX's 3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NBGNX has underperformed DSCGX with an annualized return of 1.71%, while DSCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.79% annualized return.


NBGNX

YTD

0.86%

1M

-1.38%

6M

-0.83%

1Y

8.57%

5Y*

4.89%

10Y*

1.71%

DSCGX

YTD

3.34%

1M

-0.54%

6M

6.81%

1Y

15.74%

5Y*

9.31%

10Y*

7.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBGNX vs. DSCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGNX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DSCGX's 0.32% expense ratio.


NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
Expense ratio chart for NBGNX: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for DSCGX: current value at 0.32% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.32%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NBGNX vs. DSCGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBGNX is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DSCGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DSCGX is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NBGNX vs. DSCGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NBGNX, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.380.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for NBGNX, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.671.26
The chart of Omega ratio for NBGNX, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.081.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for NBGNX, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.351.10
The chart of Martin ratio for NBGNX, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.183.66
NBGNX
DSCGX

The current NBGNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the DSCGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBGNX and DSCGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.38
0.82
NBGNX
DSCGX

Dividends

NBGNX vs. DSCGX - Dividend Comparison

NBGNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
0.00%0.00%3.07%11.05%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.05%0.20%0.47%0.52%0.38%
DSCGX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio
0.60%0.62%0.72%0.83%0.56%0.58%0.74%0.99%0.72%0.84%0.78%0.63%

Drawdowns

NBGNX vs. DSCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGNX drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, which is greater than DSCGX's maximum drawdown of -43.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGNX and DSCGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-11.64%
-5.21%
NBGNX
DSCGX

Volatility

NBGNX vs. DSCGX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) have volatilities of 4.08% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.08%
4.14%
NBGNX
DSCGX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab