IJS vs. XJR
IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) and XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while XJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJS returned 5.34%/yr vs 5.18%/yr for XJR. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IJS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XJR.
Performance
IJS vs. XJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IJS having a 15.51% return and XJR slightly lower at 15.29%.
IJS
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 36.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
XJR
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.18%
- 10Y*
- —
IJS vs. XJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 15.51% | 6.54% | 7.33% | 14.68% | -11.34% | 30.53% | 37.16% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 15.29% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJS and XJR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between IJS and XJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJS vs. XJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJS
XJR
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJS
XJR
Consumer Cyclical
IJS
XJR
Industrials
IJS
XJR
Technology
IJS
XJR
Real Estate
IJS
XJR
Energy
IJS
XJR
Healthcare
IJS
XJR
Basic Materials
IJS
XJR
Communication Services
IJS
XJR
Consumer Defensive
IJS
XJR
Utilities
IJS
XJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJS vs. XJR — Risk / Return Rank
IJS
XJR
IJS vs. XJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJS | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 2.93 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.88 | 9.42 | +3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJS | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.55 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.67 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
IJS vs. XJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than XJR's maximum drawdown of -27.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and XJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJS | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -27.14% | -32.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -9.43% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.65% | -27.14% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -27.14% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -1.08% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -9.46% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.93% | -0.09% |
Volatility
IJS vs. XJR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 4.79%, while iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJS | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 5.06% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 12.41% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 17.95% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 21.45% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 21.73% | +1.88% |
IJS vs. XJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XJR's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJS vs. XJR - Dividend Comparison
IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than XJR's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.42% | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.00% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.59% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IJS and XJR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XJR has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to IJS (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs XJR's -27.14%.
On 5-year performance, IJS leads with 5.34% vs 5.18% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IJS has performed better with a 5.34% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.
IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.99% for XJR.
IJS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.12% for XJR.
IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJS and XJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer