IJR vs. VTWO
IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index while VTWO tracks the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJR returned 10.68%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for VTWO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.06% expense ratio.
Performance
IJR vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 18.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJR having a 10.68% annualized return and VTWO not far ahead at 11.12%.
IJR
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 33.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
VTWO
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 41.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
IJR vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 16.89% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 18.87% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJR and VTWO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.97 |
The correlation between IJR and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJR vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJR
VTWO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJR
VTWO
Industrials
IJR
VTWO
Technology
IJR
VTWO
Consumer Cyclical
IJR
VTWO
Healthcare
IJR
VTWO
Real Estate
IJR
VTWO
Energy
IJR
VTWO
Basic Materials
IJR
VTWO
Communication Services
IJR
VTWO
Consumer Defensive
IJR
VTWO
Utilities
IJR
VTWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJR vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank
IJR
VTWO
IJR vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJR | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 3.83 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.94 | 13.62 | -0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJR | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.20 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.29 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.53 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
IJR vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, which is greater than VTWO's maximum drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and VTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJR | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -41.19% | -16.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -10.99% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -27.57% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -31.88% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.36% | -41.19% | -3.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -8.39% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.08% | -0.48% |
Volatility
IJR vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) is 4.42%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that IJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJR | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 5.69% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 13.57% | -1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.51% | 19.12% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 22.49% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 23.08% | -0.18% |
IJR vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IJR and VTWO have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJR vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than VTWO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.14% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.07% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, IJR and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to IJR (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs VTWO's -41.19%.
On 10-year performance, VTWO leads with 11.12% vs 10.68% for IJR. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 10.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR and VTWO have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.
IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 1.07% for VTWO.
IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.
VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJR and VTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer