PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IJR vs. IWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IJR and IWM is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

IJR vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
901.61%
581.23%
IJR
IWM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IJR:

0.90

IWM:

0.98

Sortino Ratio

IJR:

1.39

IWM:

1.48

Omega Ratio

IJR:

1.17

IWM:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

IJR:

1.49

IWM:

1.08

Martin Ratio

IJR:

4.47

IWM:

4.88

Ulcer Index

IJR:

3.95%

IWM:

4.18%

Daily Std Dev

IJR:

19.55%

IWM:

20.71%

Max Drawdown

IJR:

-58.15%

IWM:

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

IJR:

-6.51%

IWM:

-6.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IJR has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 9.55%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.


IJR

YTD

2.40%

1M

2.52%

6M

5.19%

1Y

15.41%

5Y*

8.42%

10Y*

9.55%

IWM

YTD

2.04%

1M

2.55%

6M

4.64%

1Y

18.54%

5Y*

7.32%

10Y*

8.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IJR vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJR has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Expense ratio chart for IWM: current value at 0.19% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.19%
Expense ratio chart for IJR: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IJR vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IJR is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IJR is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IJR is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IJR is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IJR is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IJR is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWM is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWM is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWM is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWM is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWM is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWM is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IJR vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IJR, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.900.98
The chart of Sortino ratio for IJR, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.391.48
The chart of Omega ratio for IJR, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.171.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for IJR, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.491.08
The chart of Martin ratio for IJR, currently valued at 4.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.474.88
IJR
IWM

The current IJR Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJR and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.90
0.98
IJR
IWM

Dividends

IJR vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than IWM's 1.12% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
2.00%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.21%1.48%1.23%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.12%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%1.26%

Drawdowns

IJR vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-6.51%
-6.71%
IJR
IWM

Volatility

IJR vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) is 5.97%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that IJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.97%
6.50%
IJR
IWM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab