PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJK vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJK vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, IJK has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.54%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


IJK

1D
0.34%
1M
4.53%
YTD
19.41%
6M
18.76%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
11.54%

VOO

1D
0.39%
1M
4.62%
YTD
11.34%
6M
11.27%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJK vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
19.41%7.28%15.68%17.41%-19.03%18.68%22.45%25.96%-10.53%19.64%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.34%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IJK and VOO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.88

The correlation between IJK and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJK vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJK
VOO

Industrials

31.1%
8.3%

Technology

21.8%
35.7%

Healthcare

13.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
10.2%

Financial Services

7.3%
11.6%

Real Estate

5.5%
1.9%

Energy

3.7%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
4.9%

Utilities

2.0%
2.4%

Communication Services

1.5%
11.3%

Industrials

IJK
31.1%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

IJK
21.8%
VOO
35.7%

Healthcare

IJK
13.5%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IJK
7.9%
VOO
10.2%

Financial Services

IJK
7.3%
VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

IJK
5.5%
VOO
1.9%

Energy

IJK
3.7%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

IJK
3.6%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IJK
2.1%
VOO
4.9%

Utilities

IJK
2.0%
VOO
2.4%

Communication Services

IJK
1.5%
VOO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJK vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJK
IJK Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJK vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJKVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.23

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

15.03

-2.94

IJK vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJK Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJK and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJKVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.44

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.84

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.87

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.89

-0.52

Drawdowns

IJK vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJKVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.47%

-33.99%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-8.90%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.63%

-18.69%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-24.52%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.25%

-33.99%

-5.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.80%

-3.69%

-7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.91%

+0.60%

Volatility

IJK vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.78%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJKVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

2.78%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

8.90%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.00%

11.80%

+5.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

16.81%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.06%

18.00%

+3.06%

IJK vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJK vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
0.54%0.66%0.79%1.13%1.08%0.50%0.70%1.09%1.13%0.93%1.15%1.12%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJK and VOO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJK has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to VOO (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.55% vs 11.54% for IJK. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.54% for IJK.

IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJK and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer