IJK vs. VOO
IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJK is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJK returned 11.54%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJK charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
IJK vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, IJK has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.54%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
IJK
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 19.41%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IJK vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 19.41% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 22.45% | 25.96% | -10.53% | 19.64% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.34% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJK and VOO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IJK and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJK vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJK
VOO
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IJK
VOO
Technology
IJK
VOO
Healthcare
IJK
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
IJK
VOO
Financial Services
IJK
VOO
Real Estate
IJK
VOO
Energy
IJK
VOO
Basic Materials
IJK
VOO
Consumer Defensive
IJK
VOO
Utilities
IJK
VOO
Communication Services
IJK
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJK vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
IJK
VOO
IJK vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJK | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.23 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 15.03 | -2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJK | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.44 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.84 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.87 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.89 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
IJK vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJK | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.47% | -33.99% | -20.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -8.90% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.63% | -18.69% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -24.52% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.25% | -33.99% | -5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.80% | -3.69% | -7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.91% | +0.60% |
Volatility
IJK vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.78%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJK | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 2.78% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 8.90% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 11.80% | +5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 16.81% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 18.00% | +3.06% |
IJK vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJK vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJK and VOO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJK has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to VOO (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.55% vs 11.54% for IJK. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.54% for IJK.
IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJK and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer