IJK vs. SLYG
IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJK is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJK returned 11.62%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for SLYG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJK charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.
Performance
IJK vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 18.08% return, which is significantly lower than SLYG's 19.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJK having a 11.62% annualized return and SLYG not far behind at 11.27%.
IJK
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 18.08%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
SLYG
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
IJK vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 18.08% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 22.45% | 25.96% | -10.53% | 19.64% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 19.06% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJK and SLYG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IJK and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJK vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJK
SLYG
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IJK
SLYG
Technology
IJK
SLYG
Healthcare
IJK
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
IJK
SLYG
Financial Services
IJK
SLYG
Real Estate
IJK
SLYG
Energy
IJK
SLYG
Basic Materials
IJK
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
IJK
SLYG
Utilities
IJK
SLYG
Communication Services
IJK
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJK vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
IJK
SLYG
IJK vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJK | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.11 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 10.92 | +0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJK vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJK | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.47% | -62.92% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -9.10% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.63% | -27.39% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -29.18% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.25% | -41.86% | +2.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | 0.00% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -14.90% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.59% | -0.06% |
Volatility
IJK vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 5.57%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJK | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 5.57% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 12.98% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 17.92% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 21.57% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 22.76% | -1.66% |
IJK vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJK vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than SLYG's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.55% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.69% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IJK and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJK has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to SLYG (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs SLYG's -62.92%.
On 10-year performance, IJK leads with 11.62% vs 11.27% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJK has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.
SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.55% for IJK.
IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SLYG is Small Cap Growth Equities. IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.15% for SLYG.
IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJK and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer