PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJK vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJK vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 18.08% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 10.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IJK has outperformed IVOV with an annualized return of 11.62%, while IVOV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.71% annualized return.


IJK

1D
2.99%
1M
2.01%
YTD
18.08%
6M
15.02%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.62%

IVOV

1D
1.80%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.95%
6M
8.24%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJK vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
18.08%7.28%15.68%17.41%-19.03%18.68%22.45%25.96%-10.53%19.64%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
10.95%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IJK and IVOV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.86

The correlation between IJK and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJK vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJK
IVOV

Industrials

31.1%
18.8%

Technology

21.8%
9.2%

Healthcare

13.5%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
13.5%

Financial Services

7.3%
21.9%

Real Estate

5.5%
9.6%

Energy

3.7%
7.4%

Basic Materials

3.6%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
5.5%

Utilities

2.0%
4.2%

Communication Services

1.5%
0.5%

Industrials

IJK
31.1%
IVOV
18.8%

Technology

IJK
21.8%
IVOV
9.2%

Healthcare

IJK
13.5%
IVOV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IJK
7.9%
IVOV
13.5%

Financial Services

IJK
7.3%
IVOV
21.9%

Real Estate

IJK
5.5%
IVOV
9.6%

Energy

IJK
3.7%
IVOV
7.4%

Basic Materials

IJK
3.6%
IVOV
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

IJK
2.1%
IVOV
5.5%

Utilities

IJK
2.0%
IVOV
4.2%

Communication Services

IJK
1.5%
IVOV
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJK vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJK
IJK Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJK vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJKIVOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.02

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.46

6.96

+4.49

IJK vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJK Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJK and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJK vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJKIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.47%

-45.99%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-10.58%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.63%

-22.61%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-22.61%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.25%

-45.99%

+6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

0.00%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-5.42%

-5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

3.07%

-0.54%

Volatility

IJK vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) at 4.08%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJKIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

4.08%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

10.83%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

15.33%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

19.51%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.10%

21.73%

-0.63%

IJK vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJK vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than IVOV's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
0.55%0.66%0.79%1.13%1.08%0.50%0.70%1.09%1.13%0.93%1.15%1.12%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.64%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJK and IVOV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJK has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to IVOV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 10-year performance, IJK leads with 11.62% vs 10.71% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJK has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.55% for IJK.

IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IVOV is Mid Cap Value Equities. IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.10% for IVOV.

IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJK and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer